Daily update on 20251109-030228 by Nitload Youmu. Additional Message : Dynamic wrapping is briefly ok, a special sorting is required.
Signed-off-by: Nitload <YoumuLiu_NSI@whv0t.onmicrosoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ namespace StgSharp.Mathematics.Numeric
|
||||
bool hasSlice = columnAfterBaseTile > 0;
|
||||
bool isLargeSlice = extraColumnCount > 0;
|
||||
|
||||
// count tiles for wrap
|
||||
// _count tiles for wrap
|
||||
int wrapWidth = wrap!.WrapTaskCapacity/**/;
|
||||
int columnFromSlicingCount = (hasSlice ? extraColumnPerThread : 0) * wrapWidth;
|
||||
int baseColumn = wrapWidth * tilePerThreadLess * tileWidth;
|
||||
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ namespace StgSharp.Mathematics.Numeric
|
||||
current->SecColumnCountInTile = current->SecCount;
|
||||
current->SecTileOffset = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
// remove tiles count
|
||||
// remove tiles _count
|
||||
extraColumnCount--;
|
||||
columnAfterBaseTile -= columnFromSlicingCount;
|
||||
total -= columnInWrap;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user